Posted on Leave a comment

dark_lord’s latest blog : presentation styles


Presentation Styles

25 Nov 2021 7:54PM  
Views : 96
Unique : 90

This is a related topic to my previous blog concerning image style. How we present our images has an effect on how they’re perceived.

The vast majority of images are viewed online these days, or at least on an electronic device. The way images are presented on screen and in print can be very different. Some ways work just as well, others suit one or the other medium better. Better is a subjective term of course, it’s that some ways are more effective than others. So I’ll look at some examples with some general guidance.

Let’s first consider online images. Most are displayed on a web page as is. Often this is fine, and for general sites where images are purely informational you don’t need any more. For photographic sites, and sites where the image is important it can help if the image is demarcated in some way. Many poto sites have black or dark grey backgrounds. That in itself is a presentation style and with good reason, as the images, especially colour, appear more vibrant that way. Strongly coloured or darker images need something to contain or define the extremities and a thin keyline does help. Equally with pale or high key images on a white background.

The question then becomes how wide a keyline to use. Thin lines are often sufficient. Black or white keylines often work best as they don’t fight the image for attention. There is a school of thought that says avoid coloured lines. But they are worth a try, for example a sepia line around a sepia toned image may be less stark than black or white. Bright colours work less well, or rather suit fewer subjects. But don’t feel constrained. Simple keylines look good on printed images.


The next step is a border. They can be used for effect, to simulate the white border you used to get on prints years ago. Given that screen area is an issue, borders can make the displayed image small and thus lss engaging for the viewer. Great if you have a 4K screen but phone and tablet viewers will be at a disadvantage. With print there’s more freedom to choose, though as a viewer I’m not a fan of small images floating in a sea of white as I feel cheated that I cant enjoy the image to it’s fullest extent. Certainly with prints though, some border, whether that’s space on the print itself or the use of a mount, can set the image off in a frame. Mount colour is important, and generally pale neutral tones suit most images. Darker mounts can complement an image, for example dark green surrounding a woodland image though the important thing is that it’s complementary. If you have a bright subject you may want to try a bright mount, but I’d say it’s much harder work. Or maybe you prefer he image going right up to the frame edges?


There was a trend when digital photography first became popular for wacky borders, from multiple lines to ornate frames. Multiple lines are a big distraction, and just because it’s possible doesn’t mean it should be used. It could work on occasion, for example a stark graphic mono image with several alternating black and white mini borders, but it’s so much the exception. Over the top borders so draw attention from the image.


Talking of frames, why use an ornate classical looking gold frame for online images? I can understand that if you’re selling frames or framed prints and need to show them in context. I’m not saying don’t use one but for online viewing a cleaner look is better appreciated, and again remember you’ve limited screen space.

Photobooks are yet another area and really deserve to be treated separately as you’re into numerous layout options. Suffice to say that they are smaller in format so you have similar issues to screen size.

The important thing to remember is that it should be the image that takes centre stage and keeping presentation simple is the most effective way.

All text and images © Keith Rowley 2021

Source link

Posted on Leave a comment

Lowepro Protactic Range Extended With New Backpack, Messenger & Toploader Styles

Lowepro Protactic Range Extended With New Backpack, Messenger & Toploader Styles

The Lowepro ProTactic camera bag range combines practicality, modularity and versatility for the travelling photographer.

Bags, Cases and Straps

ProTactic BP 300 AW II Backpack

LowePro’s Protactic Range has been expanded to include a new backpack, one messenger style bag and 2 toploaders to give photographers more choice when it comes to how they want to carry and protect their camera gear.

The new bags are the ProTactic BP 300 AW II Backpack, ProTactic MG 160 AW II Messenger, ProTactic TLZ 70 AW Toploader and the ProTactic TLZ 75 AW Toploader.

All of the camera bags in the Protactic Range are modular and feature a divider system that can be configured to suit as well as removed altogether to turn the bags into everyday bags for essentials and laptops.


ProTactic MG 160 AW II Messenger, ProTactic Toploader


The ProTactic TLZ 70 AW and TLZ 75 AW are fully compatible with Lowepro ProTactic series BP 350 AW II and BP 450 AW II backpacks’ belts. They can also be worn in multiple ways: in holster-style, with a chest harness and with the provided waist-belt. The ProTactic TLZ 70 AW expands to hold up to 24-70mm f/2.8, even with lens hood and portrait grip; and TLZ 75 AW expands to hold up to 70-200mm f/2.8 even with lens hood and portrait grip. 

Gear is accessed via the side of the ProTactic BP 300 AW II while personal belongings and laptop are accessed from the top making it quicker to grab your camera as you won’t be hunting through other items to get to it. Other features of the bags include support at the shoulder blades, lumbar and waist, a structured back panel that allows the air to circulate for improved comfort, chest strap on the ProTactic BP 300 AW II and an easily adjustable shoulder strap on the ProTactic MG 160 AW II.

Prices range from £69.95 to £159.93 and more information can be found on the LowePro website. 

Support this site by making a Donation, purchasing Plus Membership, or shopping with one of our affiliates:
Amazon UK,
Amazon US,
Amazon CA,
ebay UK,

It doesn’t cost you anything extra when you use these links, but it does support the site, helping keep ePHOTOzine free to use, thank you.

Source link

Posted on Leave a comment

dudler’s latest blog : contrasts and styles


Contrasts and styles

25 Sep 2020 8:20AM  
Views : 58
Unique : 49


A few days ago, I posted a blog about Bob Carlos Clarke, and Colin (nellacphoto) added one of his pictures of Jilly Johnson signing a Carlos Clarke print, and shared a link to YouTube with JJ being photographed by BCC, and also by Patrick Lichfield, Beverley Goodway, Jo Spence, and Jane Bown.

Jane Bown probably ought to be better known than she is: she won’t tick all the boxes for most, right down to the way she held her camera… But she was a brilliant and self-effacing portraitist – finished in 18 minutes, though this might exclude the time JJ spent removing her makeup.

Lichfield went for classy high glamour, Goodway shot his standard sort of Page 3 image. Jo Spence (a feminist, whose worked tended to be political) shot her in the kitchen, wearing ordinary clothes, almost deglamourised. And followed up with a still life of groceries with plastic boobs… ‘In advertising they’ve become a commodity’ explained Spence. ‘It’s just not my thing’ said Johnson.

Carlos Clarke put her – literally – on a pedestal, with a bow and arrow, posing on one leg. She tended to fall off… BCC’s explanation of what he was going to do in the darkroom followed: amazingly complex work, even in Photoshop, and he had to make ‘25 or 30’ prints to get the effect he wanted – you can see the result (upside down, as Johnson signed it) in my blog ‘BCC’ a few days ago.

It’s always an interesting exercise to view one person or place as pictured by different artists: maybe if you follow the link Colin provided the other day, you can work out for yourself whether anyone penetrated the Page 3 mask to find the real Jilly Johnson. The illustration is a striking marcher at Make Poverty History, as I’ve never had the pleasure of meeting and photogrpahing JJ…

Source link